<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 317 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102790</link>
    <description>Sandstone cut to specified dimensions for wall cladding was held not to be merely cut stone under Heading 2516. Because the goods were processed beyond simple sawing and the charges reflected additional labour and shaping for a distinct commercial use, they answered the description of articles of stone under Heading 68.07 of the Central Excise Tariff. The tariff classification under Heading 68.07 was therefore upheld, and the duty demand was sustained in favour of Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:42:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 317 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102790</link>
      <description>Sandstone cut to specified dimensions for wall cladding was held not to be merely cut stone under Heading 2516. Because the goods were processed beyond simple sawing and the charges reflected additional labour and shaping for a distinct commercial use, they answered the description of articles of stone under Heading 68.07 of the Central Excise Tariff. The tariff classification under Heading 68.07 was therefore upheld, and the duty demand was sustained in favour of Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>