<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 261 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102756</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both the writ appeal and the original petition, ruling that the Cochin Stock Exchange Ltd. is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and does not qualify as an authority under Article 12. The court also determined that the issues raised were contractual in nature and not appropriate for resolution through Article 226&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 261 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102756</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both the writ appeal and the original petition, ruling that the Cochin Stock Exchange Ltd. is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and does not qualify as an authority under Article 12. The court also determined that the issues raised were contractual in nature and not appropriate for resolution through Article 226&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>