<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 539 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102754</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission allowed restoration of the appeals, which were dismissed as withdrawn when the appellants approached them, and the appeals are now restored to their original number for further arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:37:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 539 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102754</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission allowed restoration of the appeals, which were dismissed as withdrawn when the appellants approached them, and the appeals are now restored to their original number for further arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>