<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 215 - NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102746</link>
    <description>The revision petition was accepted, dismissing the complaint against UTI for alleged deficiency in service regarding non-issuance of units under UGS-2000 despite payment. UTI was absolved of liability for the actions of its agent, Shri S.G. Godse, who accepted cash and cheques contrary to prescribed procedures. The judgment emphasized adherence to prescribed procedures and distinguished between an agent&#039;s individual liability and the principal&#039;s vicarious liability. UTI was found not vicariously liable for Shri Godse&#039;s unauthorized actions, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 215 - NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102746</link>
      <description>The revision petition was accepted, dismissing the complaint against UTI for alleged deficiency in service regarding non-issuance of units under UGS-2000 despite payment. UTI was absolved of liability for the actions of its agent, Shri S.G. Godse, who accepted cash and cheques contrary to prescribed procedures. The judgment emphasized adherence to prescribed procedures and distinguished between an agent&#039;s individual liability and the principal&#039;s vicarious liability. UTI was found not vicariously liable for Shri Godse&#039;s unauthorized actions, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>