<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 223 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102740</link>
    <description>The court held that the Board of Directors had the authority to postpone the Annual General Meeting (AGM) and acted in good faith in doing so. The court confirmed the lower court&#039;s decision to deny the interim injunction, considering the balance of convenience and the need for the bank&#039;s smooth functioning. The trial court was directed to expedite the trial and disposal of the suit by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:19:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 223 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102740</link>
      <description>The court held that the Board of Directors had the authority to postpone the Annual General Meeting (AGM) and acted in good faith in doing so. The court confirmed the lower court&#039;s decision to deny the interim injunction, considering the balance of convenience and the need for the bank&#039;s smooth functioning. The trial court was directed to expedite the trial and disposal of the suit by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>