<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 524 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102739</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal retained jurisdiction in Calcutta based on the appellant&#039;s registered office location. The liability of duty on hydraulic lifts and parts assembly was debated, with the appellant arguing against duty payment citing previous decisions and Board instructions. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, considering past decisions and Board directives, granting consequential reliefs as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:18:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 524 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102739</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal retained jurisdiction in Calcutta based on the appellant&#039;s registered office location. The liability of duty on hydraulic lifts and parts assembly was debated, with the appellant arguing against duty payment citing previous decisions and Board instructions. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, considering past decisions and Board directives, granting consequential reliefs as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>