<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 353 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102727</link>
    <description>Notifications granting concessional sales tax rates to local cement manufacturers and inter-State cement sales were unconstitutional because they created local preference and altered tax incidence in a way that impeded the free flow of trade and commerce under Part XIII of the Constitution. The Court held that taxation measures remain subject to constitutional scrutiny when they directly burden trade or discriminate between similarly placed traders or goods, and preferential treatment outside the permitted restrictions is invalid. The challenge to the vires of section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act was not decided because it was abandoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 353 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102727</link>
      <description>Notifications granting concessional sales tax rates to local cement manufacturers and inter-State cement sales were unconstitutional because they created local preference and altered tax incidence in a way that impeded the free flow of trade and commerce under Part XIII of the Constitution. The Court held that taxation measures remain subject to constitutional scrutiny when they directly burden trade or discriminate between similarly placed traders or goods, and preferential treatment outside the permitted restrictions is invalid. The challenge to the vires of section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act was not decided because it was abandoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>