<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 348 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102720</link>
    <description>The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission set aside the District Forum&#039;s order directing the appellant, a nominee appointed by the Kerala High Court, to pay Rs. 6,235 with interest to the widow of a deceased chit series participant. The appellant was deemed to have lacked a reasonable opportunity to present his case due to short notice for the hearing, leading to being set ex parte. The case was remitted back to the District Forum for fresh disposal, emphasizing the importance of fair hearings and granting the appellant a proper chance to contest the matter, considering legal grounds and pending liquidation proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 348 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102720</link>
      <description>The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission set aside the District Forum&#039;s order directing the appellant, a nominee appointed by the Kerala High Court, to pay Rs. 6,235 with interest to the widow of a deceased chit series participant. The appellant was deemed to have lacked a reasonable opportunity to present his case due to short notice for the hearing, leading to being set ex parte. The case was remitted back to the District Forum for fresh disposal, emphasizing the importance of fair hearings and granting the appellant a proper chance to contest the matter, considering legal grounds and pending liquidation proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>