<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 346 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102718</link>
    <description>Registration under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 was treated as relevant to the consumer-law objection, and the dispute over allotment of shares and convertible debentures was held not to involve hiring or availing of services for consideration under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Commission relied on the view that no consumer-service relationship arose between the company and the shareholder in relation to issue of convertible debentures. On that basis, the complaint was held barred by section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and was not maintainable; the dismissal by the District Forum was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 346 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102718</link>
      <description>Registration under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 was treated as relevant to the consumer-law objection, and the dispute over allotment of shares and convertible debentures was held not to involve hiring or availing of services for consideration under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Commission relied on the view that no consumer-service relationship arose between the company and the shareholder in relation to issue of convertible debentures. On that basis, the complaint was held barred by section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and was not maintainable; the dismissal by the District Forum was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>