<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 886 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102702</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with the prescribed court-fee stamp requirement can justify dismissal of appeals under the Tribunal&#039;s procedural powers, particularly where notices sent by post are returned with an endorsement of refusal to accept. The Tribunal treated the returned notices as sufficient indication of service difficulty and relied on the appellants&#039; failure to cure the formal defect. On that basis, the appeals were dismissed for non-affixation of the required court-fee stamp and the postal return marked refused to accept.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:40:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 886 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102702</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with the prescribed court-fee stamp requirement can justify dismissal of appeals under the Tribunal&#039;s procedural powers, particularly where notices sent by post are returned with an endorsement of refusal to accept. The Tribunal treated the returned notices as sufficient indication of service difficulty and relied on the appellants&#039; failure to cure the formal defect. On that basis, the appeals were dismissed for non-affixation of the required court-fee stamp and the postal return marked refused to accept.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>