https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102697 The term "Court" in section 9A of the Special Court legislation was construed in its statutory context to include curial or judicial bodies exercising adjudicatory powers, not only ordinary civil courts. Applying that construction, the Company Law Board, when deciding applications under section 111 of the Companies Act, exercised binding judicial functions concerning title and rectification and acted in a manner analogous to the former civil court jurisdiction under section 155. The proceeding before the Company Law Board was an original adjudicatory proceeding, not a true appellate proceeding, and therefore fell within the transfer scheme under section 9A. The pending section 111 proceeding stood transferred to the Special Court, and the challenge to CLB jurisdiction failed. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2019 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102697 The term "Court" in section 9A of the Special Court legislation was construed in its statutory context to include curial or judicial bodies exercising adjudicatory powers, not only ordinary civil courts. Applying that construction, the Company Law Board, when deciding applications under section 111 of the Companies Act, exercised binding judicial functions concerning title and rectification and acted in a manner analogous to the former civil court jurisdiction under section 155. The proceeding before the Company Law Board was an original adjudicatory proceeding, not a true appellate proceeding, and therefore fell within the transfer scheme under section 9A. The pending section 111 proceeding stood transferred to the Special Court, and the challenge to CLB jurisdiction failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 06 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102697