<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 880 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102695</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured on a job-work basis may still attract central excise duty where the job worker is treated as the manufacturer and the relevant exemption conditions are not satisfied. The text notes that Notification No. 214/86 requires compliance through the raw material supplier&#039;s undertaking to the Assistant Commissioner; where the supplier is not a manufacturer and no valid undertaking is given, the notification cannot be relied on. It also states that small-scale exemption does not automatically exclude duty on job-work clearances. On those facts, duty confirmation and penalty were upheld for non-payment of duty on such goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 880 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102695</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured on a job-work basis may still attract central excise duty where the job worker is treated as the manufacturer and the relevant exemption conditions are not satisfied. The text notes that Notification No. 214/86 requires compliance through the raw material supplier&#039;s undertaking to the Assistant Commissioner; where the supplier is not a manufacturer and no valid undertaking is given, the notification cannot be relied on. It also states that small-scale exemption does not automatically exclude duty on job-work clearances. On those facts, duty confirmation and penalty were upheld for non-payment of duty on such goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>