<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 880 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102695</link>
    <description>The judgment confirmed a duty of Rs. 1,00,079.00 and a penalty of Rs. 20,000.00 on the appellants for manufacturing goods on job work basis without paying duty. The Revenue&#039;s argument that goods manufactured on job work basis should attract duty was upheld, particularly for goods with other brand names. The appellants, benefiting from a small-scale exemption, failed to include the value of goods manufactured from raw materials supplied by other companies, leading to non-compliance with duty payment requirements. The appeal was rejected, affirming duty confirmation and penalty imposition for not following duty payment requirements for job work manufactured goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 880 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102695</link>
      <description>The judgment confirmed a duty of Rs. 1,00,079.00 and a penalty of Rs. 20,000.00 on the appellants for manufacturing goods on job work basis without paying duty. The Revenue&#039;s argument that goods manufactured on job work basis should attract duty was upheld, particularly for goods with other brand names. The appellants, benefiting from a small-scale exemption, failed to include the value of goods manufactured from raw materials supplied by other companies, leading to non-compliance with duty payment requirements. The appeal was rejected, affirming duty confirmation and penalty imposition for not following duty payment requirements for job work manufactured goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>