<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 925 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102691</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals against the order-in-appeal were rejected as coal ash was not deemed a manufactured excisable product subject to Central Excise duty, in line with a Gujarat High Court decision. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was not upheld, prompting the Revenue to consider appealing to the Supreme Court, but the appeals were ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 925 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102691</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals against the order-in-appeal were rejected as coal ash was not deemed a manufactured excisable product subject to Central Excise duty, in line with a Gujarat High Court decision. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was not upheld, prompting the Revenue to consider appealing to the Supreme Court, but the appeals were ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>