<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 303 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102689</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gauhati sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between Global Sugar Limited and the Petitioner Company, approving the amalgamation and directing the issuance of equity shares to Global Sugar Limited&#039;s shareholders. The court specified the detailed process for issuing shares and instructed the filing of a certified copy of the court order with the Registrar of Companies, Shillong. The judgment outlined the scheme of arrangement, including asset transfers, shareholder treatment, employee matters, necessary approvals, and dissolution procedures. It emphasized compliance requirements and consequences for non-sanctioning within the specified timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:20:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 303 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102689</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gauhati sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between Global Sugar Limited and the Petitioner Company, approving the amalgamation and directing the issuance of equity shares to Global Sugar Limited&#039;s shareholders. The court specified the detailed process for issuing shares and instructed the filing of a certified copy of the court order with the Registrar of Companies, Shillong. The judgment outlined the scheme of arrangement, including asset transfers, shareholder treatment, employee matters, necessary approvals, and dissolution procedures. It emphasized compliance requirements and consequences for non-sanctioning within the specified timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>