<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 513 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102686</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) directing examination of duty incidence refund claimed by M/s. Shyam Timber Products for unjust enrichment. The tribunal held the letter was not appealable as it did not decide any issue but sought verification, leading to the appeal being deemed not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 513 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102686</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) directing examination of duty incidence refund claimed by M/s. Shyam Timber Products for unjust enrichment. The tribunal held the letter was not appealable as it did not decide any issue but sought verification, leading to the appeal being deemed not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>