<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 511 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102683</link>
    <description>Clandestine clearance of processed goods without payment of duty justified penalty where the assessee admitted removal without duty and later deposited the duty amount. The appellate authority had set aside the penalty without giving any specific reason for that deletion and had mainly addressed penalties imposed on employees under Rule 209A. In the absence of any supporting finding for interference and in view of the admitted duty evasion, the penalty on the respondent was restored and the Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 511 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102683</link>
      <description>Clandestine clearance of processed goods without payment of duty justified penalty where the assessee admitted removal without duty and later deposited the duty amount. The appellate authority had set aside the penalty without giving any specific reason for that deletion and had mainly addressed penalties imposed on employees under Rule 209A. In the absence of any supporting finding for interference and in view of the admitted duty evasion, the penalty on the respondent was restored and the Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>