<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 297 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102677</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the validity of the selection process and the Screening Committee&#039;s authority to modify guidelines, ratified by the Central Government. The court found the guidelines were administrative instructions, not statutory conditions, and declined to investigate disputed facts under Article 226 jurisdiction. Interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 297 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102677</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the validity of the selection process and the Screening Committee&#039;s authority to modify guidelines, ratified by the Central Government. The court found the guidelines were administrative instructions, not statutory conditions, and declined to investigate disputed facts under Article 226 jurisdiction. Interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>