<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 735 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102669</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;remained closed&quot; in Notification No. 283/83-C.E. was construed to mean complete closure of the factory, not a mere suspension of manufacturing activity. Mere stoppage of production, whether partial or total, was insufficient where clearance during the relevant period was admitted. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal remained dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:46:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 735 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102669</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;remained closed&quot; in Notification No. 283/83-C.E. was construed to mean complete closure of the factory, not a mere suspension of manufacturing activity. Mere stoppage of production, whether partial or total, was insufficient where clearance during the relevant period was admitted. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal remained dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>