https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102656 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The court emphasized that the Act is designed to provide speedy relief to consumers, and disputes related to banking services fall within its ambit. The petitioners were directed to pursue their remedies before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, leaving the determination of jurisdiction and alleged deficiency in service to that forum. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:24:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102656 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The court emphasized that the Act is designed to provide speedy relief to consumers, and disputes related to banking services fall within its ambit. The petitioners were directed to pursue their remedies before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, leaving the determination of jurisdiction and alleged deficiency in service to that forum. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 05 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102656