<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 388 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102645</link>
    <description>The amended proviso to section 9(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act was held to operate retrospectively from 5 January 1957, so it could apply to subsequent sales by an unregistered dealer and was not confined to registered dealers. Because the High Court had decided the matter only on the footing that the assessee was unregistered, without examining the nature of the business or whether the transactions amounted to subsequent sales attracting tax, the matter required fresh factual scrutiny. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside and the writ petitions were remitted for reconsideration under the amended statutory regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 388 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102645</link>
      <description>The amended proviso to section 9(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act was held to operate retrospectively from 5 January 1957, so it could apply to subsequent sales by an unregistered dealer and was not confined to registered dealers. Because the High Court had decided the matter only on the footing that the assessee was unregistered, without examining the nature of the business or whether the transactions amounted to subsequent sales attracting tax, the matter required fresh factual scrutiny. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside and the writ petitions were remitted for reconsideration under the amended statutory regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>