<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 308 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102640</link>
    <description>The court admitted the petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, appointing a provisional official liquidator and ordering advertisement for wider notice. This decision was based on valid notice service, lack of company appearance, and the need to address the debt claim independently of other pending petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 308 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102640</link>
      <description>The court admitted the petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, appointing a provisional official liquidator and ordering advertisement for wider notice. This decision was based on valid notice service, lack of company appearance, and the need to address the debt claim independently of other pending petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>