https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102639 A dispute over non-allotment of shares was treated as outside consumer jurisdiction because the application for shares did not involve hiring of services for consideration. On that basis, the complaint was not maintainable as a consumer dispute and did not disclose deficiency in service. Orders passed ex parte by the District Forum in such a non-maintainable proceeding were therefore unsustainable and void. The revisional forum further noted that the State Commission should have corrected the jurisdictional defect even though delay had been raised. The complaint petitions were dismissed and the prior orders were set aside. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102639 A dispute over non-allotment of shares was treated as outside consumer jurisdiction because the application for shares did not involve hiring of services for consideration. On that basis, the complaint was not maintainable as a consumer dispute and did not disclose deficiency in service. Orders passed ex parte by the District Forum in such a non-maintainable proceeding were therefore unsustainable and void. The revisional forum further noted that the State Commission should have corrected the jurisdictional defect even though delay had been raised. The complaint petitions were dismissed and the prior orders were set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102639