<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 237 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102638</link>
    <description>A shareholder complaining of delay in issuance of share certificates was held not to be a consumer because the shareholder-company relationship does not involve hiring or availing of a service for consideration. On that basis, delay in issuing shares or debentures was not treated as deficiency in service, and the complaint was found not maintainable under consumer law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 237 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102638</link>
      <description>A shareholder complaining of delay in issuance of share certificates was held not to be a consumer because the shareholder-company relationship does not involve hiring or availing of a service for consideration. On that basis, delay in issuing shares or debentures was not treated as deficiency in service, and the complaint was found not maintainable under consumer law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>