<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 236 - HIGH COURT OF Gujarat</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102637</link>
    <description>The court ordered the amalgamation of the transferor companies with the transferee-company as per the proposed scheme, effective from April 1, 1993. All rights, liabilities, and duties were transferred to the transferee-company, and the transferor companies were dissolved without winding up. The petitioners were directed to file the order with the Registrar of Companies within thirty days. The Registrar was to treat the transferor companies as dissolved from the appointed date. The petitioners were also directed to bear the costs of the petitions and pay fees to the additional standing counsel for the Central Government. The petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 236 - HIGH COURT OF Gujarat</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102637</link>
      <description>The court ordered the amalgamation of the transferor companies with the transferee-company as per the proposed scheme, effective from April 1, 1993. All rights, liabilities, and duties were transferred to the transferee-company, and the transferor companies were dissolved without winding up. The petitioners were directed to file the order with the Registrar of Companies within thirty days. The Registrar was to treat the transferor companies as dissolved from the appointed date. The petitioners were also directed to bear the costs of the petitions and pay fees to the additional standing counsel for the Central Government. The petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>