https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102633 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as broad enough to cover a company president as an officer, so the petitioner's status did not exclude him from proceedings. The complaint also raised a jurisdictional concern because it did not state where the vehicle was handed over or where the cause of action arose; however, that defect was not treated as fatal at the quashing stage. The complainant was allowed to amend the complaint and supply the missing jurisdictional particulars, and the complaint was permitted to proceed subject to that amendment. en-us Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:47:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102633 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as broad enough to cover a company president as an officer, so the petitioner's status did not exclude him from proceedings. The complaint also raised a jurisdictional concern because it did not state where the vehicle was handed over or where the cause of action arose; however, that defect was not treated as fatal at the quashing stage. The complainant was allowed to amend the complaint and supply the missing jurisdictional particulars, and the complaint was permitted to proceed subject to that amendment. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102633