https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102626 The Commission dismissed both appeals, upholding the award of Rs. 2,000 as damages to the complainant for deficiency in service by UTI. The complainant's claim of Rs. 48,000 in alleged loss due to the delay in payment of maturity amount was rejected, as the delay was not substantial and the maturity amount became due on a specific date. UTI was found not liable for the complainant's claimed loss, and the awarded damages were considered appropriate for the inconvenience caused by the delay. en-us Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102626 The Commission dismissed both appeals, upholding the award of Rs. 2,000 as damages to the complainant for deficiency in service by UTI. The complainant's claim of Rs. 48,000 in alleged loss due to the delay in payment of maturity amount was rejected, as the delay was not substantial and the maturity amount became due on a specific date. UTI was found not liable for the complainant's claimed loss, and the awarded damages were considered appropriate for the inconvenience caused by the delay. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102626