<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 269 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102623</link>
    <description>Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act permits a State Financial Corporation to realise secured dues by sale of industrial assets, and it is not confined to selling the concern as a single unit where separate sale of machinery and of land and building better secures recovery. Section 529A of the Companies Act gives workmen&#039;s dues overriding preferential status pari passu with secured creditors, but it does not, on these facts, displace the corporation&#039;s power under section 29. The result is that separate sale of assets remained legally permissible and the challenge to the exercise of statutory power failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 269 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102623</link>
      <description>Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act permits a State Financial Corporation to realise secured dues by sale of industrial assets, and it is not confined to selling the concern as a single unit where separate sale of machinery and of land and building better secures recovery. Section 529A of the Companies Act gives workmen&#039;s dues overriding preferential status pari passu with secured creditors, but it does not, on these facts, displace the corporation&#039;s power under section 29. The result is that separate sale of assets remained legally permissible and the challenge to the exercise of statutory power failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>