https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102619 A corrigendum enhancing the duty demand was treated as part of the original order for computing limitation, so the appeal period was assessed from that composite order. Because the appellant pursued writ proceedings and then promptly approached the appellate authority after the High Court declined interference on the ground of an alternative remedy, the delay was considered condonable. The appeal was therefore maintainable, and the matter was directed to be decided on merits. en-us Wed, 16 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:29:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102619 A corrigendum enhancing the duty demand was treated as part of the original order for computing limitation, so the appeal period was assessed from that composite order. Because the appellant pursued writ proceedings and then promptly approached the appellate authority after the High Court declined interference on the ground of an alternative remedy, the delay was considered condonable. The appeal was therefore maintainable, and the matter was directed to be decided on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102619