<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 508 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102594</link>
    <description>Under Rule 173E, production norms for duty liability must be fixed on the basis of normal production conditions and all material factors affecting output; a norm based only on raw material supplied is incomplete. The Tribunal noted that the determination ignored recognised manufacturing losses and operational variables, including start-up and end-of-run losses, change-over loss, breakage, system corrections, line leaks, syrup dumpage, process variation, net content variation, off-target production, batching errors, spillage, and quality control sample drawal. Because the norm was not properly fixed, the duty demand could not be sustained and the appeals succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 508 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102594</link>
      <description>Under Rule 173E, production norms for duty liability must be fixed on the basis of normal production conditions and all material factors affecting output; a norm based only on raw material supplied is incomplete. The Tribunal noted that the determination ignored recognised manufacturing losses and operational variables, including start-up and end-of-run losses, change-over loss, breakage, system corrections, line leaks, syrup dumpage, process variation, net content variation, off-target production, batching errors, spillage, and quality control sample drawal. Because the norm was not properly fixed, the duty demand could not be sustained and the appeals succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>