<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 197 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102582</link>
    <description>Validity of a pre-winding-up sale of company land depended on the managing director&#039;s authority and the timing of the transaction. The memorandum and articles permitted land purchase and sale as part of the company&#039;s business and conferred broad management powers on the managing director; absent evidence of board-imposed restrictions, those powers extended to disposal of immovable property. Because the sale deed was executed and registered before presentation of the winding-up petition, the requirement for court leave for post-commencement sales did not apply. The land was therefore validly transferred and did not form part of the company&#039;s assets on presentation of the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 197 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102582</link>
      <description>Validity of a pre-winding-up sale of company land depended on the managing director&#039;s authority and the timing of the transaction. The memorandum and articles permitted land purchase and sale as part of the company&#039;s business and conferred broad management powers on the managing director; absent evidence of board-imposed restrictions, those powers extended to disposal of immovable property. Because the sale deed was executed and registered before presentation of the winding-up petition, the requirement for court leave for post-commencement sales did not apply. The land was therefore validly transferred and did not form part of the company&#039;s assets on presentation of the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>