https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102579 The court held that the city civil court in Bombay lacks jurisdiction to decide suits for the removal of trustees under the Indian Trusts Act, as the High Court is the principal civil court for such matters. It also ruled that civil courts cannot entertain suits for the removal of directors of a private limited company, as the Companies Act provides a comprehensive mechanism for such issues. The revision application was allowed, setting aside the trial court's order, with jurisdiction determined negatively. The operation of the order was stayed for eight weeks, and no costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:35:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102579 The court held that the city civil court in Bombay lacks jurisdiction to decide suits for the removal of trustees under the Indian Trusts Act, as the High Court is the principal civil court for such matters. It also ruled that civil courts cannot entertain suits for the removal of directors of a private limited company, as the Companies Act provides a comprehensive mechanism for such issues. The revision application was allowed, setting aside the trial court's order, with jurisdiction determined negatively. The operation of the order was stayed for eight weeks, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102579