<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 312 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102572</link>
    <description>Section 32(5) of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam authorised a market committee, with prior approval of the Director, to prohibit commission agents or brokers from interposing between producer-seller and trader-purchaser, taking commission or dalali, or acting for both sides. The measure was treated as part of the statutory scheme to curb exploitation by middlemen and protect agriculturists from excessive and illegal gains. Such restrictions were held to be in the interests of the general public and protected by Article 19(6), so the challenge under Article 19(1)(g) failed and the abolition of the kachhi adhat system was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 312 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102572</link>
      <description>Section 32(5) of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam authorised a market committee, with prior approval of the Director, to prohibit commission agents or brokers from interposing between producer-seller and trader-purchaser, taking commission or dalali, or acting for both sides. The measure was treated as part of the statutory scheme to curb exploitation by middlemen and protect agriculturists from excessive and illegal gains. Such restrictions were held to be in the interests of the general public and protected by Article 19(6), so the challenge under Article 19(1)(g) failed and the abolition of the kachhi adhat system was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>