<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 294 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102568</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the dividend income received by the transferor-company post-amalgamation should not be taxed in the hands of the assessee-company. The Court relied on a previous judgment where it was held that post-amalgamation, the transferor-company ceased to exist and could not declare or distribute dividends. The timing of the amalgamation in relation to the dividend declaration was crucial in this decision, distinguishing it from other cases cited by the revenue. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:22:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 294 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102568</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the dividend income received by the transferor-company post-amalgamation should not be taxed in the hands of the assessee-company. The Court relied on a previous judgment where it was held that post-amalgamation, the transferor-company ceased to exist and could not declare or distribute dividends. The timing of the amalgamation in relation to the dividend declaration was crucial in this decision, distinguishing it from other cases cited by the revenue. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>