<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 446 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102559</link>
    <description>Sales of weights and measures were held outside the notification covering only goods within &quot;mill-stores and hardware&quot;; the earlier view that such items were not included was accepted. Representations or clarifications by State authorities could not create estoppel against a taxing statute, so the statutory liability remained unaffected on that point. Even so, the Court declined to enforce collection in the special facts, noting the assessee&#039;s reliance on the official view, the relatively small liability for the relevant years, and the equities of the case, and directed refund if tax had already been collected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 446 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102559</link>
      <description>Sales of weights and measures were held outside the notification covering only goods within &quot;mill-stores and hardware&quot;; the earlier view that such items were not included was accepted. Representations or clarifications by State authorities could not create estoppel against a taxing statute, so the statutory liability remained unaffected on that point. Even so, the Court declined to enforce collection in the special facts, noting the assessee&#039;s reliance on the official view, the relatively small liability for the relevant years, and the equities of the case, and directed refund if tax had already been collected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>