<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 183 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102553</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions challenging the privatisation of Tamil Nadu Steels Ltd., upholding the decision as a policy matter taken in public interest. The court found the privatisation legal, not violating constitutional or statutory provisions, and emphasized that it was not amenable to judicial review. It was noted that employees&#039; rights would be safeguarded under existing laws, and the privatisation aimed to benefit the public by reducing the burden on public resources and promoting new industries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 183 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102553</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions challenging the privatisation of Tamil Nadu Steels Ltd., upholding the decision as a policy matter taken in public interest. The court found the privatisation legal, not violating constitutional or statutory provisions, and emphasized that it was not amenable to judicial review. It was noted that employees&#039; rights would be safeguarded under existing laws, and the privatisation aimed to benefit the public by reducing the burden on public resources and promoting new industries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>