<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102543</link>
    <description>Captively consumed loose cigarettes used for empirical testing within the factory remained excisable because manufacture is the taxable event, and removal is only relevant to collection and administration; Rule 93 did not exclude such goods from the duty net. The duty demand was therefore sustained. The personal penalties, however, were not justified on the facts and were set aside. The result was confirmation of duty liability with deletion of the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102543</link>
      <description>Captively consumed loose cigarettes used for empirical testing within the factory remained excisable because manufacture is the taxable event, and removal is only relevant to collection and administration; Rule 93 did not exclude such goods from the duty net. The duty demand was therefore sustained. The personal penalties, however, were not justified on the facts and were set aside. The result was confirmation of duty liability with deletion of the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>