<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 315 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102525</link>
    <description>The anti-dumping regime under the Customs Tariff Act and the MRTP Act operate in distinct fields: anti-dumping law governs dumped imports and duty, while the MRTP Act addresses restrictive trade practices. The existence of customs remedies does not by itself exclude MRTP Commission scrutiny of competition-related conduct, but the Commission cannot control import policy, customs valuation, or anti-dumping levy. The MRTP Act is territorially confined to India and may reach the Indian leg or post-import effects of restrictive trade practice, yet it cannot restrain foreign exporters for pre-import conduct completed outside India. The injunctions against the foreign exporters were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 315 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102525</link>
      <description>The anti-dumping regime under the Customs Tariff Act and the MRTP Act operate in distinct fields: anti-dumping law governs dumped imports and duty, while the MRTP Act addresses restrictive trade practices. The existence of customs remedies does not by itself exclude MRTP Commission scrutiny of competition-related conduct, but the Commission cannot control import policy, customs valuation, or anti-dumping levy. The MRTP Act is territorially confined to India and may reach the Indian leg or post-import effects of restrictive trade practice, yet it cannot restrain foreign exporters for pre-import conduct completed outside India. The injunctions against the foreign exporters were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>