<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 312 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102520</link>
    <description>An imported 8 Channel Stereo Processor was examined for classification as sound reproducing apparatus under Heading 8519.99 of the Customs Tariff. On the catalogue and product inputs, the equipment received sound from a 2-channel stereo CD or tape but lacked a sound head mechanism and any mechanism for using sound records. Because the record showed it did not function as a sound reproducer, classification under Heading 8519.99 was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:03:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 312 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102520</link>
      <description>An imported 8 Channel Stereo Processor was examined for classification as sound reproducing apparatus under Heading 8519.99 of the Customs Tariff. On the catalogue and product inputs, the equipment received sound from a 2-channel stereo CD or tape but lacked a sound head mechanism and any mechanism for using sound records. Because the record showed it did not function as a sound reproducer, classification under Heading 8519.99 was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>