<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 138 - STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102499</link>
    <description>The Commission found in favor of the petitioner, directing the opposite party No. 1 to pay the redemption value of Rs. 8,64,780 within ten days, adjusted for the partial payment already made. Additionally, a compensation amount of Rs. 3,17,130 was awarded, reduced by the amount already paid. The Commission declined to award interest for the past period but ordered the opposite party to pay costs assessed at Rs. 1,000 to the petitioner. The judgment disposed of the complaint, holding the opposite party liable for the delayed redemption payment and inadequate compensation, thus providing relief to the petitioner for the financial loss incurred due to the delay in payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 138 - STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102499</link>
      <description>The Commission found in favor of the petitioner, directing the opposite party No. 1 to pay the redemption value of Rs. 8,64,780 within ten days, adjusted for the partial payment already made. Additionally, a compensation amount of Rs. 3,17,130 was awarded, reduced by the amount already paid. The Commission declined to award interest for the past period but ordered the opposite party to pay costs assessed at Rs. 1,000 to the petitioner. The judgment disposed of the complaint, holding the opposite party liable for the delayed redemption payment and inadequate compensation, thus providing relief to the petitioner for the financial loss incurred due to the delay in payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>