<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 137 - ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102498</link>
    <description>The Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upheld the District Forum&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing that the representations made in the brochure and pamphlet were binding on the Unit Trust of India. The Commission found in favor of the complainants, citing the application of promissory estoppel and the reliance placed on the promised maturity dates by the guardian. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 137 - ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102498</link>
      <description>The Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upheld the District Forum&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing that the representations made in the brochure and pamphlet were binding on the Unit Trust of India. The Commission found in favor of the complainants, citing the application of promissory estoppel and the reliance placed on the promised maturity dates by the guardian. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>