<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 447 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102474</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the importer, upholding the classification of the stapling machine as industrial for garment production. The court emphasized the machine&#039;s crucial role in the manufacturing process and aligned the import with the relevant policy and exceptions under the REP license. The manufacturer&#039;s need for the machine in garment production was deemed significant, leading to a decision in favor of the importer. The Revenue was directed to pay costs to the importer following the court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 447 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102474</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the importer, upholding the classification of the stapling machine as industrial for garment production. The court emphasized the machine&#039;s crucial role in the manufacturing process and aligned the import with the relevant policy and exceptions under the REP license. The manufacturer&#039;s need for the machine in garment production was deemed significant, leading to a decision in favor of the importer. The Revenue was directed to pay costs to the importer following the court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>