<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 443 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of Customs duty but set aside the penalty and confiscation of goods in the case involving M/s. Suncity Art Exporters. The Tribunal found no mala fide intention in the importation of goods and noted that the goods were imported as advised by foreign buyers. The logging of export in the DEEC book was denied due to discrepancies in the exported goods. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with a previous ruling involving the same appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 443 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of Customs duty but set aside the penalty and confiscation of goods in the case involving M/s. Suncity Art Exporters. The Tribunal found no mala fide intention in the importation of goods and noted that the goods were imported as advised by foreign buyers. The logging of export in the DEEC book was denied due to discrepancies in the exported goods. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with a previous ruling involving the same appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>