<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 231 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102446</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed. The Court held that the Board of Directors did not lose its power to refuse transmission after two months, the decision was not mala fide, the company had the power to refuse registration or transmission of shares, the subsequent amendment of the articles of association was valid, and the refusal of registration by the Board was not a wrongful or mala fide exercise of discretion. No order was made as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 231 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102446</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed. The Court held that the Board of Directors did not lose its power to refuse transmission after two months, the decision was not mala fide, the company had the power to refuse registration or transmission of shares, the subsequent amendment of the articles of association was valid, and the refusal of registration by the Board was not a wrongful or mala fide exercise of discretion. No order was made as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>