<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 229 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102444</link>
    <description>The complaint was dismissed as there was a full and final settlement of all claims between the parties, including those related to profits and compensation. The complainant was recognized as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, but the settlement precluded any further claims for losses. The issue of res judicata was not addressed due to the settlement, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 229 - A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102444</link>
      <description>The complaint was dismissed as there was a full and final settlement of all claims between the parties, including those related to profits and compensation. The complainant was recognized as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, but the settlement precluded any further claims for losses. The issue of res judicata was not addressed due to the settlement, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>