<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 227 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102442</link>
    <description>An alleged failure to obtain Central Government approval for increasing remuneration under section 310 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as not constituting an offence under section 629A, because section 310 was described as declaratory and not as imposing a positive obligation or express prohibition. A penal prosecution under section 629A requires breach of a specific direction, prohibition, or condition attached to approval or sanction, and no such condition or restriction was pleaded here. On that reasoning, the complaint was held misconceived and the proceedings liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 227 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102442</link>
      <description>An alleged failure to obtain Central Government approval for increasing remuneration under section 310 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as not constituting an offence under section 629A, because section 310 was described as declaratory and not as imposing a positive obligation or express prohibition. A penal prosecution under section 629A requires breach of a specific direction, prohibition, or condition attached to approval or sanction, and no such condition or restriction was pleaded here. On that reasoning, the complaint was held misconceived and the proceedings liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>