https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102428 The High Court allowed the appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, to quash the Company Law Board's order dated July 30, 1993. The Court found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice as the appellant, a director, was not afforded a hearing opportunity. The Court held that the appeal was maintainable against the order, rejecting the respondent's arguments. Consequently, the Court declared the order illegal, quashed it, and directed parties to bear their own costs. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:11:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102428 The High Court allowed the appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, to quash the Company Law Board's order dated July 30, 1993. The Court found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice as the appellant, a director, was not afforded a hearing opportunity. The Court held that the appeal was maintainable against the order, rejecting the respondent's arguments. Consequently, the Court declared the order illegal, quashed it, and directed parties to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102428