https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102424 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction may be invoked against an ex parte temporary injunction where ordinary remedies under appeal or Order 39 Rule 4 are not practically effective before the restrained event, and the order would otherwise render the suit infructuous. In the described public issue dispute, the court treated the timing of the restraint and the imminent issue date as making supervisory interference necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice. On merits, approval by SEBI, compliance with suggested amendments, and approval of the printed form and advertisement showed no prima facie case for stopping the issue, while the balance of convenience and irreparable harm favoured the petitioner. The restraint was therefore vacated. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:08:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102424 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction may be invoked against an ex parte temporary injunction where ordinary remedies under appeal or Order 39 Rule 4 are not practically effective before the restrained event, and the order would otherwise render the suit infructuous. In the described public issue dispute, the court treated the timing of the restraint and the imminent issue date as making supervisory interference necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice. On merits, approval by SEBI, compliance with suggested amendments, and approval of the printed form and advertisement showed no prima facie case for stopping the issue, while the balance of convenience and irreparable harm favoured the petitioner. The restraint was therefore vacated. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102424