<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 234 - STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102414</link>
    <description>The Commission held that the complainant, as a shareholder who purchased shares, qualified as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act. They emphasized that purchasing shares involved consideration and entitled the shareholder to benefits, making them a consumer. Citing a previous judgment, the Commission noted that share transfers constituted services, further supporting the complainant&#039;s consumer status. Consequently, the Commission allowed the appeal, overturned the District Forum&#039;s decision, and remanded the case for reconsideration. The parties were instructed to return to the District Forum for continued proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 234 - STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102414</link>
      <description>The Commission held that the complainant, as a shareholder who purchased shares, qualified as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act. They emphasized that purchasing shares involved consideration and entitled the shareholder to benefits, making them a consumer. Citing a previous judgment, the Commission noted that share transfers constituted services, further supporting the complainant&#039;s consumer status. Consequently, the Commission allowed the appeal, overturned the District Forum&#039;s decision, and remanded the case for reconsideration. The parties were instructed to return to the District Forum for continued proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>