<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 483 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102408</link>
    <description>Soapy matter arising during the manufacture of banaspati was treated as waste and not shown to be commercially marketable, so it was not liable to central excise duty. The record also did not establish that the assessee had carried out any separate process to convert it into acid oil or soap stock. Applying the earlier view on a similar manufacturing process, the document states that a waste or intermediate product is exigible to excise only if marketability as such is proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 483 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102408</link>
      <description>Soapy matter arising during the manufacture of banaspati was treated as waste and not shown to be commercially marketable, so it was not liable to central excise duty. The record also did not establish that the assessee had carried out any separate process to convert it into acid oil or soap stock. Applying the earlier view on a similar manufacturing process, the document states that a waste or intermediate product is exigible to excise only if marketability as such is proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>