https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102406 The Supreme Court held that the expression "the High Court" in section 10F of the Companies Act refers to the High Court having jurisdiction over the place where the registered office of the company is located. The appeal was allowed, and the Delhi High Court's order was set aside. The appeal against the Company Law Board's order should be filed in the Madras High Court, where the company's registered office is situated. No costs were awarded in this case. en-us Tue, 05 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102406 The Supreme Court held that the expression "the High Court" in section 10F of the Companies Act refers to the High Court having jurisdiction over the place where the registered office of the company is located. The appeal was allowed, and the Delhi High Court's order was set aside. The appeal against the Company Law Board's order should be filed in the Madras High Court, where the company's registered office is situated. No costs were awarded in this case. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102406